← New Search ↗ Social Card

Marcus Sang Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2002-02-27 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2018-19 Lawrenceville School NE-Prep 30 4 5 9 0.300 0.0579 0.0579 0.1373 0.1373
2019-20 Lawrenceville School NE-Prep 25 6 3 9 0.360 0.0694 0.0694 0.1647 0.1647
2020-21 New Jersey Jr. Titans NAHL 3 0 0 0 0.000
2021-22 New Jersey Jr. Titans NAHL 47 4 7 11 0.234 0.0831 0.0818 0.2457 0.2418
2022-23 New Jersey Jr. Titans NAHL 58 9 14 23 0.397 0.1409 0.1318 0.4164 0.3894
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Tufts D3 NESCAC GR 25 4 5 9 0.360
2024-25 Tufts D3 NESCAC SR 23 7 2 9 0.391
2023-24 Tufts D3 NESCAC JR 25 2 1 3 0.120
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.10
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.12
2023-24 · Tufts
+25.4% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

30%
NCAA D1
5%
NCAA D2/D3
62%
Age-Out / Club
2%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#41644
Forward overall
#2607
Forward born in 2002

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing
NCAAe PPG
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Boston University
0.23 No data
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.47 PPG
→ Bentley (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Strong
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Brown (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Wisconsin-Eau Claire · 2007-08
0.571 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Rivier · 2024-25
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
Wisconsin-Stout · 2014-15
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.