← New Search ↗ Social Card

Liam Cox-Smith Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2003-04-16 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2020-21 Minot Minotauros NAHL 3 0 0 0 0.000
2021-22 Philadelphia Hockey Club NCDC 41 12 16 28 0.683 0.2784 0.2888 0.3518 0.3661
2022-23 Sherwood Park Crusaders AJHL 38 6 12 18 0.474 0.1589 0.1540 0.4384 0.4250
2023-24 Melville Millionaires SJHL 30 9 14 23 0.767 0.1964 0.1838 0.5779 0.5409
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Liberty University ACHA_D1 30 5 12 17 0.567
2024-25 Liberty University ACHA_D1 30 5 12 17 0.567
2023-24 Liberty University ACHA_D1 30 5 12 17 0.567
2022-23 Liberty University ACHA_D1 30 5 12 17 0.567
2021-22 Liberty University ACHA_D1 30 5 12 17 0.567
2020-21 Liberty University ACHA_D1 30 5 12 17 0.567

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

22%
NCAA D1
12%
NCAA D2/D3
40%
Age-Out / Club
22%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#37282
Forward overall
#2310
Forward born in 2003

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing
NCAAe PPG
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Boston University
0.23 No data
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Strong
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Brown (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.59 PPG
→ Minnesota State (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.31 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Skidmore · 2016-17
0.538 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Concordia · 2023-24
0.704 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Wisconsin-Stevens Point · 2016-17
0.586 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.