← New Search ↗ Social Card

Dimitry Kebreau Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2003-06-16 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2020-21 Maryland Black Bears NAHL 5 0 0 0 0.000
2021-22 Maryland Black Bears NAHL 51 7 11 18 0.353 0.1398 0.1467 0.3705 0.3887
2022-23 Maryland Black Bears NAHL 50 25 16 41 0.820 0.3249 0.3249 0.8609 0.8608
2023-24 Maryland Black Bears NAHL 57 19 33 52 0.912 0.3615 0.3442 0.9578 0.9120
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Alaska Anchorage D1 WCHA SO 19 2 7 9 0.474
2024-25 Alaska Anchorage D1 31 8 15 23 0.742
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.29
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.74
2024-25 · Alaska Anchorage
+157.6% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

32%
NCAA D1
18%
NCAA D2/D3
48%
Age-Out / Club
2%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#15752
Forward overall
#779
Forward born in 2003
#813
in NAHL

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Brown (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.28 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.59 PPG
→ Minnesota (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.32 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.80 PPG
→ RIT (0.65 D1 FR PPG)
0.44 Strong
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.20 Strong
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.24 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

St. Norbert · 2002-03
0.839 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Concordia (WI) · 2012-13
0.704 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
SUNY Geneseo · 2003-04
0.821 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.