IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Cooper Morris Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2002-06-02 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2019-20 Neepawa Titans MJHL 55 7 10 17 0.309 0.0595 0.0595 0.1948 0.1948
2020-21 Neepawa Titans MJHL 10 2 1 3 0.300 0.0577 0.0577 0.1890 0.1890
2021-22 Anchorage Wolverines NAHL 60 1 36 37 0.617 0.2191 0.2185 0.6505 0.6487
2022-23 Anchorage Wolverines NAHL 57 2 33 35 0.614 0.2182 0.2069 0.6476 0.6140
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 St. Norbert D3 NCHA GR 31 1 7 8 0.258
2024-25 St. Norbert D3 NCHA SR 30 1 5 6 0.200
2023-24 St. Norbert D3 NCHA JR 30 0 2 2 0.067
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.20
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.07
2023-24 · St. Norbert
-66.6% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

55%
NCAA D1
8%
NCAA D2/D3
18%
Age-Out / Club
20%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#6430
Defenseman overall
#1551
Defenseman born in 2002

D1 Comparables

Dominic Racobaldo
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ American International (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Brandon Carlson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Marc-Antoine Carrier
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.37 PPG
→ Brown (0.04 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Matt Krug
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.21 PPG
→ Union (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.11 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
William Eiserman
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.15 PPG
→ UMass Lowell (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.08 Developing D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Joe Watson
Utica · 2003-04
0.714 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Brendan Dicker
Arcadia · 2021-22
0.542 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Matthew Lison
Bowdoin · 2013-14
1.083 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.