← New Search ↗ Social Card

Brendan Gibbons Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2002-06-15 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2018-19 St. Marks NE-Prep 28 6 15 21 0.750 0.2116 0.2116 0.3432 0.3432
2019-20 St. Marks NE-Prep 27 14 25 39 1.444 0.4075 0.4075 0.6610 0.6610
2020-21 NCDC 33 6 13 19 0.576 0.3211 0.3211 0.4656 0.4656
2021-22 Maine Nordiques NAHL 37 20 14 34 0.919 0.3641 0.3637 0.9648 0.9638
2022-23 Maine Nordiques NAHL 60 17 41 58 0.967 0.3830 0.3638 1.0149 0.9640
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Air Force D1 AHA JR 37 6 14 20 0.540
2024-25 Air Force D1 AHA SR 39 9 9 18 0.462
2023-24 Air Force D1 AHA JR 34 7 5 12 0.353
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.31
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.35
2023-24 · Air Force
+13.3% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

35%
NCAA D1
12%
NCAA D2/D3
42%
Age-Out / Club
10%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#10834
Forward overall
#522
Forward born in 2002

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Brown (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.28 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.80 PPG
→ RIT (0.65 D1 FR PPG)
0.44 Strong
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.59 PPG
→ Minnesota (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.32 Developing
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.33 PPG
→ UMass (0.13 D1 FR PPG)
0.50 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.91 PPG
→ Minnesota (0.15 D1 FR PPG)
0.51 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Fredonia · 2018-19
0.818 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Milwaukee School of Engineering · 2010-11
1.038 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Manhattanville · 2003-04
0.875 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.