← New Search ↗ Social Card

Wilmer Svensson Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2001-09-12 Country: Sweden
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2018-19 Djurgårdens IF U20 SuperElit 14 1 0 1 0.071 0.0282 0.0300 0.0970 0.1032
2019-20 Djurgårdens IF U20 SuperElit 43 6 13 19 0.442 0.1744 0.1744 0.6001 0.6001
2020-21 Djurgårdens IF U20 SuperElit 14 1 7 8 0.571 0.2255 0.2255 0.7760 0.7760
2021-22 New Mexico Ice Wolves NAHL 46 11 18 29 0.630 0.2316 0.2226 0.6654 0.6396
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Gustavus Adolphus D3 MIAC SR 19 11 7 18 0.947
2024-25 Gustavus Adolphus D3 MIAC JR 24 9 13 22 0.917
2023-24 Gustavus Adolphus D3 MIAC SO 24 7 8 15 0.625
2022-23 Gustavus Adolphus D3 MIAC FR 11 2 2 4 0.364
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.12
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.36
2022-23 · Gustavus Adolphus
+191.8% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

38%
NCAA D1
25%
NCAA D2/D3
30%
Age-Out / Club
8%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#19487
Forward overall
#929
Forward born in 2001

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.00 PPG
→ Denver (0.31 D1 FR PPG)
0.35 Developing
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.03 PPG
→ Nebraska Omaha (0.06 D1 FR PPG)
0.36 Developing
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.79 PPG
→ Bentley (0.19 D1 FR PPG)
0.28 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Strong
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

SUNY Plattsburgh · 2014-15
0.692 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
St. Thomas · 2010-11
0.615 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Bowdoin · 2014-15
0.640 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.