← New Search ↗ Social Card

Wilmer Svensson Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2001-09-12 Country: Sweden
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2018-19 Djurgårdens IF U20 SuperElit 14 1 0 1 0.071 0.0280 0.0298 0.0877 0.0933
2019-20 Djurgårdens IF U20 SuperElit 43 6 13 19 0.442 0.1731 0.1731 0.5428 0.5428
2020-21 Djurgårdens IF U20 SuperElit 14 1 7 8 0.571 0.2239 0.2239 0.7019 0.7019
2021-22 New Mexico Ice Wolves NAHL 46 11 18 29 0.630 0.2498 0.2401 0.6619 0.6362
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Gustavus Adolphus D3 MIAC SR 19 11 7 18 0.947
2024-25 Gustavus Adolphus D3 MIAC JR 24 9 13 22 0.917
2023-24 Gustavus Adolphus D3 MIAC SO 24 7 8 15 0.625
2022-23 Gustavus Adolphus D3 MIAC FR 11 2 2 4 0.364
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.13
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.36
2022-23 · Gustavus Adolphus
+172.4% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

35%
NCAA D1
10%
NCAA D2/D3
55%
Age-Out / Club
0%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#19368
Forward overall
#901
Forward born in 2001

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.24 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.20 Strong
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Brown (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.28 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.46 PPG
→ Air Force (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.26 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ Wisconsin
0.22 No data
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

St. Thomas · 2010-11
0.615 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
SUNY Plattsburgh · 2014-15
0.692 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
SUNY Plattsburgh · 2014-15
0.647 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.