← New Search ↗ Social Card

Dylan Contreras Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2003-05-23 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2021-22 Corpus Christi IceRays NAHL 55 5 20 25 0.455 0.1670 0.1746 0.4804 0.5024
2022-23 Corpus Christi IceRays NAHL 56 8 24 32 0.571 0.2099 0.2092 0.6039 0.6019
2023-24 Kenai River Brown Bears NAHL 60 19 36 55 0.917 0.3368 0.3196 0.9689 0.9193
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2026-27 Alaska Anchorage D1 WCHA JR 0 0 0 0 0.000
2025-26 Alaska Anchorage D1 WCHA SO 26 3 3 6 0.231
2024-25 Alaska Anchorage D1 WCHA — 29 8 4 12 0.414
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.24
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.41
2024-25 · Alaska Anchorage
+75.5% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

52%
NCAA D1
8%
NCAA D2/D3
22%
Age-Out / Club
18%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#18131
Forward overall
#916
Forward born in 2003
#1050
in NAHL

D1 Comparables

NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.93 PPG
→ Nebraska Omaha (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.32 Developing
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.06 PPG
→ Niagara (0.58 D1 FR PPG)
0.36 Strong
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Brown (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.59 PPG
→ Minnesota State (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.31 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.80 PPG
→ RIT (0.65 D1 FR PPG)
0.43 Strong
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Arcadia · 2021-22
0.920 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Adrian · 2010-11
0.778 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Concordia · 2012-13
0.704 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.