IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Riley Storzuk Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1992-05-30 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2009-10 Flin Flon Bombers SJHL 6 0 0 0 0.000 — — — —
2010-11 Flin Flon Bombers SJHL 57 6 10 16 0.281 0.0855 0.0890 0.2080 0.2166
2011-12 Flin Flon Bombers SJHL 46 22 36 58 1.261 0.3841 0.3791 0.9345 0.9224
2012-13 Flin Flon Bombers SJHL 44 18 39 57 1.296 0.3946 0.3719 0.9601 0.9050
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2013-14 Concordia D3 MIAC — 27 6 13 19 0.704
2013-14 Concordia (WI) D3 — FR 27 6 13 19 0.704
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.32
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.70
2013-14 · Concordia
+119.4% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#13807
Forward overall
#531
Forward born in 1992
#116
in SJHL

D1 Comparables

Todd Skirving
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.80 PPG
→ RIT (0.65 D1 FR PPG)
0.44 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Davey Middleton
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Brown (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.28 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Jordan Nelson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.59 PPG
→ Minnesota (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.32 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Carlos Amestoy
OHL · 2012-13 · 0.75 PPG
→ Maine
0.39 No data
NCAAe PPG
Brandon Wahlin
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.33 PPG
→ UMass (0.13 D1 FR PPG)
0.50 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Luke Simpson
St. Scholastica · 2013-14
0.929 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Paul Boutoussov
Salve Regina · 2016-17
0.724 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Chris Duszynski
Norwich · 2009-10
0.731 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.