← New Search ↗ Social Card

Tristan Shewchuk Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: ⚠ Missing — add in admin Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2017-18 Melville Millionaires SJHL 4 0 1 1 0.250 0.0640 0.0640 0.1885 0.1885
2018-19 Melville Millionaires SJHL 51 10 10 20 0.392 0.1005 0.1005 0.2956 0.2956
2019-20 Humboldt Broncos SJHL 52 30 26 56 1.077 0.2759 0.2759 0.8118 0.8118
2020-21 Humboldt Broncos SJHL 6 5 5 10 1.667 0.4270 0.4270 1.2564 1.2564
2021-22 Springfield Jr. Blues NAHL 51 8 16 24 0.471 0.1729 0.1729 0.4967 0.4967
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 St. Scholastica D3 MIAC SR 15 0 7 7 0.467
2023-24 St. Scholastica D3 MIAC SO 25 9 9 18 0.720
2022-23 St. Scholastica D3 MIAC FR 23 6 12 18 0.783
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.12
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.78
2022-23 · St. Scholastica
+535.2% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

28%
NCAA D1
15%
NCAA D2/D3
25%
Age-Out / Club
32%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#25760
Forward overall

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.23 PPG
→ Army (0.23 D1 FR PPG)
0.14 Developing
NCAAe PPG
NTDP-U18 · 2012-13 · 0.12 PPG
→ Boston College (0.72 D1 FR PPG)
0.09 Strong
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.45 PPG
→ Michigan State (0.25 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.13 PPG
→ Maine (0.28 D1 FR PPG)
0.08 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ Harvard (0.24 D1 FR PPG)
0.26 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Endicott · 2012-13
0.875 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
SUNY Geneseo · 2003-04
0.550 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Gustavus Adolphus · 2014-15
0.423 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.