← New Search ↗ Social Card

McCabe Dvorak Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2002-07-15 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2019-20 St. Louis Park USHS-MN 26 28 13 41 1.577 0.1943 0.1943 0.3830 0.3830
2020-21 St. Louis Park USHS-MN 15 11 5 16 1.067 0.1314 0.1314 0.2591 0.2591
2021-22 Fairbanks Ice Dogs NAHL 55 5 19 24 0.436 0.1550 0.1555 0.4582 0.4596
2022-23 Fairbanks Ice Dogs NAHL 59 7 12 19 0.322 0.1144 0.1091 0.3381 0.3225
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Wisconsin-Stout D3 WIAC JR 24 2 4 6 0.250
2024-25 Wisconsin-Stout D3 WIAC SO 8 2 0 2 0.250
2023-24 Wisconsin-Stout D3 WIAC FR 12 2 1 3 0.250
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.11
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.25
2023-24 · Wisconsin-Stout
+128.7% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

22%
NCAA D1
12%
NCAA D2/D3
62%
Age-Out / Club
2%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#31612
Forward overall
#1869
Forward born in 2002

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Strong
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing
NCAAe PPG
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Boston University
0.23 No data
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ Wisconsin
0.21 No data
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

SUNY Potsdam · 2022-23
0.360 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Suffolk · 2018-19
0.429 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Wisconsin-Eau Claire · 2008-09
0.353 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.