IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Austin Salani Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2003-08-07 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2021-22 Austin Bruins NAHL 57 9 10 19 0.333 0.1321 0.1395 0.3499 0.3696
2022-23 Austin Bruins NAHL 52 15 32 47 0.904 0.3581 0.3606 0.9489 0.9556
2023-24 Austin Bruins NAHL 60 32 38 70 1.167 0.4622 0.4434 1.2249 1.1750
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Dartmouth D1 ECAC SO 18 1 1 2 0.111
2024-25 Dartmouth D1 ECAC — 1 0 0 0 0.000

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

38%
NCAA D1
0%
NCAA D2/D3
50%
Age-Out / Club
12%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#11407
Forward overall
#513
Forward born in 2003
#344
in NAHL

D1 Comparables

Tim Bonner
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.89 PPG
→ Yale
0.50 No data
NCAAe PPG
A.J. Reid
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.18 PPG
→ Air Force (0.26 D1 FR PPG)
0.45 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Jared VanWormer
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.27 PPG
→ Ferris State (0.19 D1 FR PPG)
0.48 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Brandon Wahlin
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.33 PPG
→ UMass (0.13 D1 FR PPG)
0.50 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Jonathan Davis
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.03 PPG
→ Nebraska Omaha (0.06 D1 FR PPG)
0.39 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Braydon Beahm
St. Norbert · 2024-25
0.968 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Dakota Dubetz
Marian · 2008-09
1.333 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Matt Galati
SUNY Oswego · 2012-13
1.241 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.