← New Search ↗ Social Card

Xavier Alexandre Jean-Louis Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2001-06-25 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2019-20 Carleton Place Canadians CCHL 42 2 7 9 0.214 0.0465 0.0465 0.1658 0.1658
2020-21 Carleton Place Canadians CCHL 0 0 0 0 0.000
2021-22 Austin Bruins NAHL 53 1 17 18 0.340 0.1248 0.1186 0.3584 0.3406
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Ferris State D1 CCHA 37 5 10 15 0.405
2024-25 Ferris State D1 CCHA 30 2 4 6 0.200
2023-24 Alaska Fairbanks D1 WCHA 26 2 2 4 0.154
2022-23 Alaska Fairbanks D1 WCHA 13 0 3 3 0.231
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.11
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.23
2022-23 · Alaska Fairbanks
+106.1% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

20%
NCAA D1
12%
NCAA D2/D3
55%
Age-Out / Club
12%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#15773
Defenseman overall
#2606
Defenseman born in 2001

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.21 PPG
→ Union (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.11 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.15 PPG
→ UMass Lowell (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.08 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ American International (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.37 PPG
→ Brown (0.04 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Developing D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Neumann · 2014-15
0.333 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Plymouth State · 2016-17
0.375 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Lake Forest · 2014-15
0.474 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.