IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Paul Huglen Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2003-03-03 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2019-20 Roseau USHS-MN 28 20 13 33 1.179 0.1492 0.1492 0.2863 0.2863
2020-21 Roseau USHS-MN 21 17 16 33 1.571 0.1989 0.1989 0.3817 0.3817
2021-22 Bismarck Bobcats NAHL 44 3 14 17 0.386 0.1420 0.1469 0.4078 0.4219
2022-23 — NAHL 30 5 7 12 0.400 0.1470 0.1449 0.4222 0.4161
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2023-24 Concordia D3 MIAC — 8 0 2 2 0.250
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.12
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.25
2023-24 · Concordia
+100.5% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

22%
NCAA D1
12%
NCAA D2/D3
30%
Age-Out / Club
35%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#32324
Forward overall
#1934
Forward born in 2003

D1 Comparables

Stanislav Dzakhov
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.27 PPG
→ Niagara (0.44 D1 FR PPG)
0.15 Average
NCAAe PPG
Tayler Munson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.31 PPG
→ Alaska Fairbanks (0.35 D1 FR PPG)
0.17 Average
NCAAe PPG
Ben Ostlie
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.23 PPG
→ Notre Dame
0.13 No data
NCAAe PPG
Alexander Dahl
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.21 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Gage Hough
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.39 PPG
→ UMass Lowell (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.22 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Jeff Forsythe
Wisconsin-Superior · 2007-08
0.621 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Barry Kneedler
Neumann · 2015-16
1.125 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Leo Stolpe
Plymouth State · 2016-17
0.870 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.