← New Search ↗ Social Card

Jeff Forsythe Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 1988-02-29 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2005-06 Williams Lake TimberWolves BCHL 3 0 0 0 0.000
2006-07 Prince George Spruce Kings BCHL 54 18 27 45 0.833 0.3211 0.3251 1.2127 1.2279
2007-08 Prince George Spruce Kings BCHL 30 8 12 20 0.667 0.2569 0.2463 0.9702 0.9300
2008-09 Victoria Grizzlies BCHL 42 9 9 18 0.429 0.1651 0.1513 0.6237 0.5717
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2013-14 Wisconsin-Superior D3 BigTen SR 25 4 10 14 0.560
2012-13 Wisconsin-Superior D3 WIAC JR 25 6 12 18 0.720
2011-12 Wisconsin-Superior D3 WIAC SO 27 8 6 14 0.518
2010-11 Wisconsin-Superior D3 WIAC FR 29 8 10 18 0.621
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.18
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.62
2010-11 · Wisconsin-Superior
+247.3% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#5710
Defenseman overall
#871
Defenseman born in 1988
#1318
in BCHL

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.18 PPG
→ RIT (0.05 D1 FR PPG)
0.09 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.37 PPG
→ Brown (0.04 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.08 PPG
→ Minnesota State (0.06 D1 FR PPG)
0.04 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ American International (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

SUNY Geneseo · 2011-12
0.471 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Milwaukee School of Engineering · 2011-12
0.862 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Lawrence · 2018-19
0.444 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.