| Season | Team | League | GP | G | A | Pts | PPG | NCAAe-PPG | Age-Adj | D3e-PPG | Age-Adj |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2005-06 | Williams Lake TimberWolves | BCHL | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.000 | — | — | — | — |
| 2006-07 | Prince George Spruce Kings | BCHL | 54 | 18 | 27 | 45 | 0.833 | 0.3243 | 0.3284 | 1.2152 | 1.2304 |
| 2007-08 | Prince George Spruce Kings | BCHL | 30 | 8 | 12 | 20 | 0.667 | 0.2595 | 0.2488 | 0.9722 | 0.9320 |
| 2008-09 | Victoria Grizzlies | BCHL | 42 | 9 | 9 | 18 | 0.429 | 0.1668 | 0.1529 | 0.6250 | 0.5729 |
| Season | School | Div | Conference | Year | GP | G | A | Pts | PPG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2013-14 | Wisconsin-Superior | D3 | BigTen | SR | 25 | 4 | 10 | 14 | 0.560 |
| 2012-13 | Wisconsin-Superior | D3 | — | JR | 25 | 6 | 12 | 18 | 0.720 |
| 2011-12 | Wisconsin-Superior | D3 | — | SO | 27 | 8 | 6 | 14 | 0.518 |
| 2010-11 | Wisconsin-Superior | D3 | — | FR | 29 | 8 | 10 | 18 | 0.621 |
How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.
Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.