← New Search ↗ Social Card

Jeff Forsythe Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 1988-02-29 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2005-06 Williams Lake TimberWolves BCHL 3 0 0 0 0.000
2006-07 Prince George Spruce Kings BCHL 54 18 27 45 0.833 0.3243 0.3284 1.2152 1.2304
2007-08 Prince George Spruce Kings BCHL 30 8 12 20 0.667 0.2595 0.2488 0.9722 0.9320
2008-09 Victoria Grizzlies BCHL 42 9 9 18 0.429 0.1668 0.1529 0.6250 0.5729
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2013-14 Wisconsin-Superior D3 BigTen SR 25 4 10 14 0.560
2012-13 Wisconsin-Superior D3 JR 25 6 12 18 0.720
2011-12 Wisconsin-Superior D3 SO 27 8 6 14 0.518
2010-11 Wisconsin-Superior D3 FR 29 8 10 18 0.621
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.18
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.62
2010-11 · Wisconsin-Superior
+243.9% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#2927
Defenseman overall
#707
Defenseman born in 1988
#1431
in BCHL

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.18 PPG
→ RIT (0.05 D1 FR PPG)
0.10 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.37 PPG
→ Brown (0.04 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.08 PPG
→ Minnesota State (0.06 D1 FR PPG)
0.05 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.64 PPG
→ Ohio State (0.50 D1 FR PPG)
0.22 Elite D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ American International (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Developing D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Milwaukee School of Engineering · 2011-12
0.862 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
SUNY Geneseo · 2011-12
0.471 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Northland · 2014-15
0.458 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.