← New Search ↗ Social Card

Collin Pederson Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2001-10-20 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2019-20 Owatonna USHS-MN 26 14 16 30 1.154 0.1421 0.1421 0.2801 0.2801
2020-21 Rochester Grizzlies NA3HL 10 3 5 8 0.800 0.0885 0.0885 0.2526 0.2526
2021-22 Anchorage Wolverines NAHL 56 7 8 15 0.268 0.0952 0.0920 0.2826 0.2731
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Wisconsin-Superior D3 WIAC SR 13 4 1 5 0.385
2024-25 Wisconsin-Superior D3 WIAC JR 13 5 4 9 0.692
2023-24 Wisconsin-Superior D3 WIAC SO 18 1 3 4 0.222
2022-23 Wisconsin-Superior D3 WIAC FR 25 2 7 9 0.360
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.10
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.36
2022-23 · Wisconsin-Superior
+275.4% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

35%
NCAA D1
12%
NCAA D2/D3
52%
Age-Out / Club
0%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#31930
Forward overall
#1697
Forward born in 2001

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ Wisconsin
0.21 No data
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.31 PPG
→ Alaska Fairbanks (0.35 D1 FR PPG)
0.17 Average
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Strong
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.21 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Saint John's · 2012-13
0.478 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
SUNY Oswego · 2012-13
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
Fredonia · 2015-16
0.375 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.