IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Eric Witzel Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1992-10-23 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2010-11 Navan Grads CCHL 5 0 1 1 0.200 0.0434 0.0449 0.1547 0.1599
2011-12 Rockland Nationals CCHL 56 7 23 30 0.536 0.1162 0.1142 0.4145 0.4072
2012-13 Ottawa Jr. Senators CCHL 53 14 22 36 0.679 0.1473 0.1382 0.5255 0.4931
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2015-16 Canton D3 SUNYAC JR 20 6 9 15 0.750
2014-15 Canton D3 SUNYAC SO 25 13 14 27 1.080
2013-14 SUNY Oswego D3 SUNYAC FR 1 0 0 0 0.000

NCAAe Rankings

#28708
Forward overall
#1071
Forward born in 1992
#614
in CCHL

D1 Comparables

Cullen Hurley
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ Wisconsin
0.21 No data
NCAAe PPG
Tyler Deresky
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.79 PPG
→ Bentley (0.19 D1 FR PPG)
0.28 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Woody Hudson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Max Birkinbine
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.46 PPG
→ Air Force (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Tayler Munson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.31 PPG
→ Alaska Fairbanks (0.35 D1 FR PPG)
0.17 Average
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Josiah Roen
Bethel · 2017-18
0.480 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Arthur Gordon
SUNY Geneseo · 2014-15
0.652 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Mike Collins
Elmira · 2011-12
1.000 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.