← New Search ↗ Social Card

Hayden Hennen Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2002-08-13 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2019-20 Kittson County Central USHS-MN 25 11 37 48 1.920 0.5169 0.5169 0.4664 0.4664
2020-21 Kittson County Central USHS-MN 15 13 20 33 2.200 0.5922 0.5922 0.5344 0.5344
2021-22 Anchorage Wolverines NAHL 44 4 10 14 0.318 0.1261 0.1270 0.3341 0.3365
2022-23 Anchorage Wolverines NAHL 56 8 24 32 0.571 0.2264 0.2169 0.5999 0.5747
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Augustana D1 CCHA JR 37 3 12 15 0.405
2024-25 Augustana D1 CCHA SR 34 3 12 15 0.441
2023-24 Augustana D1 CCHA JR 32 4 10 14 0.438
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.17
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.44
2023-24 · Augustana
+156.1% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

30%
NCAA D1
10%
NCAA D2/D3
50%
Age-Out / Club
10%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#3594
Defenseman overall
#958
Defenseman born in 2002

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.45 PPG
→ Ohio State (0.50 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Elite D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.21 PPG
→ Union (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.12 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ American International (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.15 PPG
→ UMass Lowell (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.08 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Adrian · 2010-11
0.577 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
New England College · 2018-19
0.304 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Concordia · 2014-15
0.577 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.