IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Mack Oliphant Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2002-12-28 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2019-20 Lawrence Academy NE-Prep 27 0 2 2 0.074 0.0147 0.0147 0.0338 0.0338
2020-21 Boston Jr. Bruins NCDC 35 0 5 5 0.143 0.0583 0.0583 0.1149 0.1149
2021-22 Johnstown Tomahawks NAHL 28 1 11 12 0.429 0.1575 0.1616 0.4524 0.4641
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Holy Cross D1 AHA SR 38 5 12 17 0.447
2024-25 Holy Cross D1 AHA JR 36 3 26 29 0.806
2023-24 Holy Cross D1 AHA SO 38 2 8 10 0.263
2022-23 Holy Cross D1 AHA FR 41 2 10 12 0.293
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.10
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.29
2022-23 · Holy Cross
+201.4% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

52%
NCAA D1
8%
NCAA D2/D3
15%
Age-Out / Club
25%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#15433
Defenseman overall
#2817
Defenseman born in 2002

D1 Comparables

Eric Schurhamer
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Maine (0.37 D1 FR PPG)
0.14 Strong D
NCAAe PPG
Vince Pedrie
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.32 PPG
→ Penn State (0.69 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Elite D
NCAAe PPG
Eric Sweetman
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.29 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.39 D1 FR PPG)
0.17 Strong D
NCAAe PPG
Cliff Watson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.18 PPG
→ Michigan Tech (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.10 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Johnny Wingels
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.29 PPG
→ Miami
0.17 No data
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Corey Kennedy
Neumann · 2013-14
0.500 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Kyle Stroh
St. Norbert · 2007-08
0.481 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Matt Volonnino
Plymouth State · 2012-13
1.056 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.