← New Search ↗ Social Card

Niklas Miller Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2003-02-14 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2021-22 Shreveport Mudbugs NAHL 35 7 3 10 0.286 0.1132 0.1169 0.3000 0.3097
2022-23 Shreveport Mudbugs NAHL 48 9 11 20 0.417 0.1651 0.1623 0.4375 0.4302
2023-24 St. Cloud Norsemen NAHL 37 6 15 21 0.568 0.2249 0.2104 0.5959 0.5574
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 SUNY Oswego D3 SUNYAC SO 23 3 1 4 0.174
2024-25 SUNY Oswego D3 SUNYAC FR 19 1 1 2 0.105
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.16
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.11
2024-25 · SUNY Oswego
-35.6% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

25%
NCAA D1
18%
NCAA D2/D3
50%
Age-Out / Club
8%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#31276
Forward overall
#1856
Forward born in 2003
#2912
in NAHL

D1 Comparables

QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Boston University
0.23 No data
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.47 PPG
→ Bentley (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.26 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.59 PPG
→ Minnesota (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.32 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Brown (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.28 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Saint Mary's (MN) · 2022-23
0.364 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Wilkes · 2017-18
1.208 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Beloit · 2024-25
0.348 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.