IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Nick Ramm Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2003-04-27 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2020-21 Northeast Generals NA3HL 15 13 8 21 1.400 0.1548 0.1548 0.4435 0.4435
2021-22 Northeast Generals NAHL 27 2 7 9 0.333 0.1184 0.1234 0.3499 0.3647
2022-23 Northeast Generals NAHL 53 10 8 18 0.340 0.1206 0.1198 0.3565 0.3540
2023-24 Maine Nordiques NAHL 48 7 9 16 0.333 0.1184 0.1119 0.3499 0.3308
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Wentworth D3 CNE — 24 4 7 11 0.458
2024-25 Wentworth D3 CNE — 23 4 1 5 0.217
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.10
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.22
2024-25 · Wentworth
+120.7% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

12%
NCAA D1
28%
NCAA D2/D3
57%
Age-Out / Club
2%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#39830
Forward overall
#2489
Forward born in 2003

D1 Comparables

Ali Thomas
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Eli Lichtenwald
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Yasin Cissé
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Boston University
0.23 No data
NCAAe PPG
Will Suter
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.47 PPG
→ Bentley (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Woody Hudson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Dylan Healey
Trinity · 2016-17
0.518 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Gino Colangelo
Wisconsin-Stevens Point · 2022-23
0.353 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Drew Anderson
Augsburg · 2013-14
0.680 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.