IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Bryce Battaglia Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2002-01-03 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2020-21 Charleston Colonials USPHL-Premier 31 11 19 30 0.968 0.1092 0.1092 0.3292 0.3292
2021-22 — NAHL 40 2 6 8 0.200 0.0710 0.0693 0.2100 0.2051
2022-23 Charlotte Rush USPHL-Premier 25 16 16 32 1.280 0.1444 0.1323 — —
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Arcadia D3 MAC GR 25 9 6 15 0.600
2024-25 Arcadia D3 MAC SR 23 4 6 10 0.435
2023-24 Arcadia D3 MAC JR 24 6 9 15 0.625
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.09
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.62
2023-24 · Arcadia
+581.6% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

30%
NCAA D2/D3
0%
Club / ACHA
2%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#16705
Forward overall
#892
Forward born in 2002

D1 Comparables

Will Suter
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.47 PPG
→ Bentley (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Ali Thomas
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Yasin Cissé
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Boston University
0.23 No data
NCAAe PPG
Davey Middleton
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Brown (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Eli Lichtenwald
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Strong
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Andrew Johnston
Nichols · 2003-04
0.364 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Lucas Carroll
Wisconsin-Stout · 2016-17
0.308 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Michael Houlihan
Nazareth · 2018-19
0.167 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.