IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Parker Mabbett Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2002-03-02 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2019-20 NMH NE-Prep 27 6 12 18 0.667 0.1286 0.1286 0.3051 0.3051
2021-22 Janesville Jets NAHL 48 4 3 7 0.146 0.0518 0.0510 0.1531 0.1507
2022-23 Janesville Jets NAHL 53 8 7 15 0.283 0.1005 0.0940 0.2971 0.2779
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Salve Regina D3 CNE GR 25 7 13 20 0.800
2024-25 Salve Regina D3 CNE SR 17 1 1 2 0.118
2023-24 Salve Regina D3 CNE JR 27 5 7 12 0.444
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.07
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.44
2023-24 · Salve Regina
+576.4% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

18%
NCAA D1
8%
NCAA D2/D3
72%
Age-Out / Club
2%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#44029
Forward overall
#2791
Forward born in 2002

D1 Comparables

Ali Thomas
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Yasin Cissé
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Boston University
0.23 No data
NCAAe PPG
Eli Lichtenwald
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Woody Hudson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Cullen Hurley
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ Wisconsin
0.21 No data
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Ben Lamm
Chatham · 2018-19
0.286 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Thomas Plamondon
St. John Fisher · 2024-25
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
Shawn Bartlette
St. Scholastica · 2003-04
0.481 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.