← New Search ↗ Social Card

Logan Heroux Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2003-05-30 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2020-21 Utica Jr. Comets NCDC 22 2 2 4 0.182 0.1014 0.1014 0.1470 0.1470
2021-22 Georgetown Raiders OJHL 28 3 9 12 0.429 0.1288 0.1316 0.2934 0.2997
2022-23 Shreveport Mudbugs NAHL 55 10 30 40 0.727 0.2882 0.2875 0.7636 0.7618
2023-24 Shreveport Mudbugs NAHL 59 10 26 36 0.610 0.2418 0.2297 0.6406 0.6085
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Ferris State D1 CCHA 32 0 4 4 0.125
2024-25 Ferris State D1 CCHA 32 3 9 12 0.375
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.24
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.38
2024-25 · Ferris State
+57.1% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

38%
NCAA D1
2%
NCAA D2/D3
52%
Age-Out / Club
8%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#5344
Defenseman overall
#1352
Defenseman born in 2003

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ American International (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.37 PPG
→ Brown (0.04 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.21 PPG
→ Union (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.12 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.15 PPG
→ UMass Lowell (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.08 Developing D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Utica · 2003-04
0.714 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
SUNY Geneseo · 2021-22
0.727 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Arcadia · 2021-22
0.542 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.