← New Search ↗ Social Card

Coleman Nee Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2002-02-27 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2018-19 Rivers School NE-Prep 29 1 2 3 0.103 0.0205 0.0205 0.0471 0.0471
2019-20 Rivers School NE-Prep 26 0 2 2 0.077 0.0152 0.0152 0.0350 0.0350
2021-22 New Jersey Jr. Titans NAHL 38 3 3 6 0.158 0.0580 0.0571 0.1667 0.1641
2022-23 New Jersey Jr. Titans NAHL 11 0 0 0 0.000
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Southern New Hampshire D2 NE10 GR 27 2 4 6 0.222
2024-25 Southern New Hampshire D2 NE10 SR 29 2 6 8 0.276
2023-24 Southern New Hampshire D2 NE10 JR 25 1 3 4 0.160
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.03
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.16
2023-24 · Southern New Hampshire
+363.8% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

18%
NCAA D1
15%
NCAA D2/D3
22%
Age-Out / Club
45%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#61019
Forward overall
#4088
Forward born in 2002

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.23 PPG
→ Notre Dame
0.13 No data
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.27 PPG
→ Niagara (0.44 D1 FR PPG)
0.15 Average
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.31 PPG
→ Alaska Fairbanks (0.35 D1 FR PPG)
0.17 Average
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.21 PPG
→ Northeastern
0.12 No data
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.25 PPG
→ Colorado College (0.17 D1 FR PPG)
0.14 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Arcadia · 2023-24
0.238 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Norwich · 2017-18
0.345 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
St. Norbert · 2013-14
0.433 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.