IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Carter Cloutier Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2002-03-03 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2021-22 — NAHL 28 4 1 5 0.179 0.0634 0.0624 0.1875 0.1846
2022-23 Springfield Jr. Blues NAHL 42 4 5 9 0.214 0.0761 0.0712 0.2250 0.2105
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Lawrence D3 NCHA GR 17 5 6 11 0.647
2024-25 Lawrence D3 NCHA SR 22 9 8 17 0.773
2023-24 Lawrence D3 NCHA JR 21 5 9 14 0.667
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.06
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.67
2023-24 · Lawrence
+1051.5% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

12%
NCAA D1
8%
NCAA D2/D3
80%
Age-Out / Club
0%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#51105
Forward overall
#3326
Forward born in 2002
#5894
in NAHL

D1 Comparables

Ali Thomas
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Eli Lichtenwald
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Cullen Hurley
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ Wisconsin
0.21 No data
NCAAe PPG
Tayler Munson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.31 PPG
→ Alaska Fairbanks (0.35 D1 FR PPG)
0.17 Average
NCAAe PPG
Alexander Dahl
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.21 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Joe Gori
SUNY Plattsburgh · 2003-04
0.357 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Simon Besner
SUNY Brockport · 2017-18
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
Drake Longaker
Plymouth State · 2015-16
0.333 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.