← New Search ↗ Social Card

Marshall Beaker Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2004-06-28 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2021-22 Oklahoma Warriors NAHL 1 1 1 2 2.000 0.7348 0.8089 2.1110 2.3239
2022-23 P.A.L. Junior Islanders NCDC 29 2 8 10 0.345 0.1406 0.1484 0.2639 0.2775
2023-24 P.A.L. Junior Islanders NCDC 37 5 11 16 0.432 0.1763 0.1761 0.3476 0.3471
2024-25 Charlotte Rush USPHL-Premier 24 11 12 23 0.958 0.1253 0.1170 0.5278 0.5022
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Calvin University ACHA_D1 30 11 17 28 0.933
2024-25 Calvin University ACHA_D1 30 11 17 28 0.933
2023-24 Calvin University ACHA_D1 30 11 17 28 0.933
2022-23 Calvin University ACHA_D1 30 11 17 28 0.933
2021-22 Calvin University ACHA_D1 30 11 17 28 0.933
2020-21 Calvin University ACHA_D1 30 11 17 28 0.933

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

25%
NCAA D2/D3
5%
Club / ACHA
0%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#4970
Defenseman overall
#1265
Defenseman born in 2004
#1691
in NAHL

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.21 PPG
→ Union (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.11 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.15 PPG
→ UMass Lowell (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.08 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ American International (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.37 PPG
→ Brown (0.04 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Developing D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Concordia · 2021-22
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
Fitchburg State · 2008-09
1.400 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Buffalo State · 2023-24
0.500 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.