IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Anthony Yu Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2004-07-10 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2021-22 St. Cloud Norsemen NAHL 1 0 1 1 1.000 0.3674 0.4050 1.0569 1.1652
2022-23 Powell River Kings BCHL 54 17 22 39 0.722 0.2783 0.2872 1.0504 1.0839
2023-24 Powell River Kings BCHL 53 18 37 55 1.038 0.3998 0.3942 1.5092 1.4882
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2026-27 Air Force D1 AHA JR 0 0 0 0 0.000
2025-26 Air Force D1 AHA SO 34 3 4 7 0.206
2024-25 Air Force D1 AHA — 29 3 4 7 0.241
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.30
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.24
2024-25 · Air Force
-19.7% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

45%
NCAA D1
2%
NCAA D2/D3
12%
Age-Out / Club
40%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#13204
Forward overall
#619
Forward born in 2004

D1 Comparables

Brett Skibba
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.00 PPG
→ UConn (0.23 D1 FR PPG)
0.36 Developing
NCAAe PPG
John Simonson
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.97 PPG
→ North Dakota (0.23 D1 FR PPG)
0.35 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Garret Clemment
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.93 PPG
→ Lake Superior State (0.43 D1 FR PPG)
0.34 Average
NCAAe PPG
Riley Bourbonnais
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.78 PPG
→ RPI (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.44 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Kevin Irwin
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.56 PPG
→ Vermont (0.47 D1 FR PPG)
0.32 Average
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Lucas Michaud
Trinity · 2016-17
0.893 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Johnny Panvica
St. Thomas · 2014-15
0.955 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Sean Tyrie
Worcester State · 2023-24
0.800 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.