IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Donovan Burdette Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2002-08-20 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2021-22 Utah Outliers USPHL-Premier 21 1 4 5 0.238 0.0311 0.0310 — —
2022-23 Utah Outliers USPHL-Premier 47 4 24 28 0.596 0.0779 0.0738 0.2022 0.1916
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Ohio University ACHA_D1 — — 18 0 4 4 0.222
2024-25 Ohio University ACHA_D1 — — 18 0 4 4 0.222
2023-24 Ohio University ACHA_D1 — — 18 0 4 4 0.222
2022-23 Ohio University ACHA_D1 — — 18 0 4 4 0.222
2021-22 Ohio University ACHA_D1 — — 18 0 4 4 0.222
2020-21 Ohio University ACHA_D1 — — 18 0 4 4 0.222

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

20%
NCAA D2/D3
0%
Club / ACHA
0%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#9805
Defenseman overall
#2103
Defenseman born in 2002
#2962
in USPHL-Premier

D1 Comparables

William Eiserman
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.15 PPG
→ UMass Lowell (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.08 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Matt Krug
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.21 PPG
→ Union (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.11 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Brandon Carlson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Patrick Koudys
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.23 PPG
→ RPI (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Dominic Racobaldo
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ American International (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Timothy Duffy
Saint Anselm · 2021-22
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
Andrew Froese
Finlandia · 2017-18
0.333 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Anthony Eichhorn
Lawrence · 2016-17
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.