IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Ryan Gingher Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2004-06-22 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2021-22 Janesville Jets NAHL 1 0 0 0 0.000 — — — —
2022-23 — NAHL 48 8 4 12 0.250 0.0990 0.1040 0.2625 0.2759
2023-24 El Paso Rhinos NAHL 46 6 4 10 0.217 0.0861 0.0864 0.2282 0.2289
2024-25 Watertown Shamrocks NAHL 55 11 14 25 0.455 0.1801 0.1712 0.4772 0.4536
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 St. Norbert D3 NCHA FR 30 7 10 17 0.567
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.12
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.57
2025-26 · St. Norbert
+382.3% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

25%
NCAA D1
32%
NCAA D2/D3
40%
Age-Out / Club
0%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#40104
Forward overall
#2571
Forward born in 2004
#4312
in NAHL

D1 Comparables

Eli Lichtenwald
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.20 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Woody Hudson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.24 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Davey Middleton
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Brown (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.28 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Ali Thomas
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Yasin Cissé
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Boston University
0.23 No data
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Patrick Roginski
Wilkes · 2021-22
0.368 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Andy McGlynn
Wisconsin-Eau Claire · 2017-18
0.600 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Ross Ring-Jarvi
Gustavus Adolphus · 2007-08
1.033 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.