IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Michael Mumm Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2003-01-17 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2021-22 Houston Bulls NAHL 2 0 0 0 0.000 — — — —
2022-23 Corpus Christi IceRays NAHL 17 0 1 1 0.059 0.0209 0.0205 0.0617 0.0604
2023-24 Rockland Nationals CCHL 17 0 4 4 0.235 0.0510 0.0463 0.1821 0.1652
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Elmira D3 UCHC SO 21 1 0 1 0.048
2024-25 Elmira D3 UCHC — 11 0 1 1 0.091
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.03
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.09
2024-25 · Elmira
+195.1% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

10%
NCAA D1
10%
NCAA D2/D3
75%
Age-Out / Club
0%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#56589
Forward overall
#3948
Forward born in 2003
#6543
in NAHL

D1 Comparables

Ali Thomas
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Eli Lichtenwald
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Tayler Munson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.31 PPG
→ Alaska Fairbanks (0.35 D1 FR PPG)
0.17 Average
NCAAe PPG
Stanislav Dzakhov
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.27 PPG
→ Niagara (0.44 D1 FR PPG)
0.15 Average
NCAAe PPG
Ben Ostlie
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.23 PPG
→ Notre Dame
0.13 No data
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

David Powlowski
Nazareth · 2014-15
0.292 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Vincent Nicosia
UMass Dartmouth · 2021-22
0.182 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Myles Fee
Manhattanville · 2001-02
0.250 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.