IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Hunter Allen Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2003-01-01 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2021-22 Kenai River Brown Bears NAHL 6 0 0 0 0.000 — — — —
2022-23 Oklahoma Warriors NAHL 29 5 6 11 0.379 0.1347 0.1316 0.3982 0.3891
2023-24 Oklahoma Warriors NAHL 15 2 2 4 0.267 0.0947 0.0880 0.2800 0.2602
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Adrian ACHA_D1 — — 30 7 13 20 0.667
2024-25 Adrian ACHA_D1 — — 30 7 13 20 0.667
2023-24 Adrian ACHA_D1 — — 30 7 13 20 0.667
2022-23 Adrian ACHA_D1 — — 30 7 13 20 0.667
2021-22 Adrian ACHA_D1 — — 30 7 13 20 0.667
2020-21 Adrian ACHA_D1 — — 30 7 13 20 0.667

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

10%
NCAA D1
5%
NCAA D2/D3
85%
Age-Out / Club
0%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#41614
Forward overall
#2644
Forward born in 2003
#4461
in NAHL

D1 Comparables

Ali Thomas
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Yasin Cissé
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Boston University
0.23 No data
NCAAe PPG
Eli Lichtenwald
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Woody Hudson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Cullen Hurley
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ Wisconsin
0.21 No data
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Matt Millis
Wisconsin-Stout · 2010-11
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
Eddie Matsushima
Wisconsin-River Falls · 2014-15
0.536 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Jonathan Sonedecker
St. John Fisher · 2024-25
0.286 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.