IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Camden Benson Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2002-02-27 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2020-21 Granite City Lumberjacks NA3HL 26 1 6 7 0.269 0.0298 0.0298 0.0853 0.0853
2021-22 New Mexico Ice Wolves NAHL 6 0 0 0 0.000 — — — —
2022-23 New Mexico Ice Wolves NAHL 59 3 11 14 0.237 0.0843 0.0788 0.2491 0.2329
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 St. Olaf D3 MIAC GR 26 1 3 4 0.154
2024-25 St. Olaf D3 MIAC SR 22 1 3 4 0.182
2023-24 St. Olaf D3 MIAC JR 16 3 1 4 0.250
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.07
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.25
2023-24 · St. Olaf
+236.0% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

20%
NCAA D1
8%
NCAA D2/D3
70%
Age-Out / Club
0%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#20179
Defenseman overall
#3302
Defenseman born in 2002

D1 Comparables

Carter Foguth
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.08 PPG
→ Minnesota State (0.06 D1 FR PPG)
0.04 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Michael Holland
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.18 PPG
→ RIT (0.05 D1 FR PPG)
0.09 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Marc-Antoine Carrier
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.37 PPG
→ Brown (0.04 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Dominic Racobaldo
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ American International (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Brandon Carlson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Evan Axell
Wisconsin-Superior · 2022-23
0.167 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Dylan Herold
Elmira · 2009-10
0.400 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Jake Coyle
Utica · 2007-08
0.542 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.