| Season | Team | League | GP | G | A | Pts | PPG | NCAAe-PPG | Age-Adj | D3e-PPG | Age-Adj |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2006-07 | Trail Smoke Eaters | BCHL | 56 | 10 | 12 | 22 | 0.393 | 0.1464 | 0.1553 | 0.5725 | 0.6074 |
| 2007-08 | Trail Smoke Eaters | BCHL | 46 | 2 | 4 | 6 | 0.130 | 0.0486 | 0.0489 | 0.1900 | 0.1913 |
| 2008-09 | — | BCHL | 55 | 14 | 18 | 32 | 0.582 | 0.2167 | 0.2091 | 0.8477 | 0.8181 |
| 2009-10 | Coquitlam Express | BCHL | 57 | 22 | 11 | 33 | 0.579 | 0.2156 | 0.1963 | 0.8435 | 0.7680 |
| Season | School | Div | Conference | Year | GP | G | A | Pts | PPG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2013-14 | Elmira | D3 | UCHC | SR | 26 | 1 | 7 | 8 | 0.308 |
| 2012-13 | Elmira | D3 | UCHC | JR | 7 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.000 |
| 2011-12 | Elmira | D3 | — | SO | 11 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.000 |
| 2010-11 | Elmira | D3 | — | FR | 25 | 4 | 6 | 10 | 0.400 |
How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.
Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.