← New Search ↗ Social Card

Dylan Herold Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1989-02-17 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2006-07 Trail Smoke Eaters BCHL 56 10 12 22 0.393 0.1464 0.1553 0.5725 0.6074
2007-08 Trail Smoke Eaters BCHL 46 2 4 6 0.130 0.0486 0.0489 0.1900 0.1913
2008-09 BCHL 55 14 18 32 0.582 0.2167 0.2091 0.8477 0.8181
2009-10 Coquitlam Express BCHL 57 22 11 33 0.579 0.2156 0.1963 0.8435 0.7680
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2013-14 Elmira D3 UCHC SR 26 1 7 8 0.308
2012-13 Elmira D3 UCHC JR 7 0 0 0 0.000
2011-12 Elmira D3 SO 11 0 0 0 0.000
2010-11 Elmira D3 FR 25 4 6 10 0.400
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.17
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.40
2010-11 · Elmira
+132.0% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#31731
Forward overall
#1042
Forward born in 1989
#2006
in BCHL

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Developing
NCAAe PPG
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Boston University
0.23 No data
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.47 PPG
→ Bentley (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.26 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.59 PPG
→ Minnesota (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.32 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Brown (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.28 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Roger Williams · 2024-25
0.667 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
SUNY Potsdam · 2017-18
0.625 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Manhattanville · 2005-06
0.840 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.