IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Blake Stafford Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2003-02-05 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2021-22 Oklahoma Warriors NAHL 26 0 0 0 0.000 — — — —
2022-23 — NAHL 14 0 2 2 0.143 0.0525 0.0516 0.1508 0.1481
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2024-25 Marian D3 NCHA — 19 0 2 2 0.105
2023-24 Marian D3 NCHA — 10 1 2 3 0.300
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.04
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.30
2023-24 · Marian
+578.7% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

8%
NCAA D1
10%
NCAA D2/D3
28%
Age-Out / Club
52%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#53712
Forward overall
#3655
Forward born in 2003
#6190
in NAHL

D1 Comparables

Stanislav Dzakhov
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.27 PPG
→ Niagara (0.44 D1 FR PPG)
0.15 Average
NCAAe PPG
Tayler Munson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.31 PPG
→ Alaska Fairbanks (0.35 D1 FR PPG)
0.17 Average
NCAAe PPG
Ben Ostlie
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.23 PPG
→ Notre Dame
0.13 No data
NCAAe PPG
William Messa
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.21 PPG
→ Northeastern
0.12 No data
NCAAe PPG
Matthew Hansen
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.25 PPG
→ Colorado College (0.17 D1 FR PPG)
0.14 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Derrell Levy
SUNY Oswego · 2003-04
0.263 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Clay Van Diest
St. Norbert · 2013-14
0.310 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Eric Olson
Stevenson · 2018-19
0.625 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.