IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Derrell Levy Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1984-01-30 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2002-03 North York Rangers OJHL 45 4 8 12 0.267 0.0801 0.0779 0.1826 0.1776
2003-04 Markham Waxers OJHL 39 6 16 22 0.564 0.1695 0.1572 0.3861 0.3581
2004-05 Markham Waxers OJHL 43 6 17 23 0.535 0.1607 0.1409 0.3661 0.3211
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2008-09 SUNY Oswego D3 — SR 25 3 14 17 0.680
2007-08 SUNY Oswego D3 — JR 26 4 7 11 0.423
2006-07 SUNY Oswego D3 — SO 27 1 9 10 0.370
2005-06 SUNY Oswego D3 — FR 19 1 4 5 0.263
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.13
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.26
2005-06 · SUNY Oswego
+108.6% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#37513
Forward overall
#1068
Forward born in 1984
#2787
in OJHL

D1 Comparables

Ali Thomas
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Will Suter
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.47 PPG
→ Bentley (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.26 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Yasin Cissé
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Boston University
0.23 No data
NCAAe PPG
Davey Middleton
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Brown (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.28 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Eli Lichtenwald
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.20 Strong
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Matt Robertson
Suffolk · 2008-09
0.400 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Mason Rudrud
Rivier · 2024-25
0.640 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Ian Nichols
Hamilton · 2014-15
0.333 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.