← New Search ↗ Social Card

Christian Catalano Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2003-05-23 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2018-19 Mississauga Chargers OJHL 1 0 0 0 0.000
2019-20 Caledon Admirals OJHL 5 2 0 2 0.400 0.0980 0.0980 0.2754 0.2754
2020-21 Newmarket Hurricanes OJHL 0 0 0 0 0.000
2021-22 Newmarket Hurricanes OJHL 52 34 39 73 1.404 0.3441 0.3511 0.9665 0.9863
2022-23 Maryland Black Bears NAHL 59 30 27 57 0.966 0.3549 0.3537 1.0197 1.0163
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 RIT D1 AHA JR 36 10 12 22 0.611
2024-25 RIT D1 AHA JR 33 7 16 23 0.697
2023-24 RIT D1 AHA SO 36 9 8 17 0.472
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.30
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.47
2023-24 · RIT
+56.4% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

52%
NCAA D1
8%
NCAA D2/D3
10%
Age-Out / Club
30%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#9161
Forward overall
#388
Forward born in 2003

D1 Comparables

NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.00 PPG
→ Bemidji State
0.36 No data
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.97 PPG
→ North Dakota (0.23 D1 FR PPG)
0.35 Developing
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.93 PPG
→ Lake Superior State (0.43 D1 FR PPG)
0.34 Average
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.12 PPG
→ Northern Michigan (0.29 D1 FR PPG)
0.41 Developing
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.00 PPG
→ UConn (0.23 D1 FR PPG)
0.36 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Adrian · 2013-14
1.138 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
New England College · 2018-19
0.667 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Saint Mary's (MN) · 2016-17
0.600 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.