IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

T.J. Dougan Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1999-03-25 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2017-18 Chicago Cougars USPHL-Premier 38 21 16 37 0.974 0.1274 0.1308 0.3305 0.3393
2018-19 Chicago T-Rex USPHL-Premier 44 33 34 67 1.523 0.1992 0.1939 0.5168 0.5031
2019-20 Chicago T-Rex USPHL-Premier 43 28 52 80 1.861 0.2434 0.2434 0.6315 0.6315
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2021-22 New England College D3 LittleEast — 2 0 0 0 0.000
2020-21 New England College D3 LittleEast — 6 1 3 4 0.667
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.14
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.67
2020-21 · New England College
+361.7% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

10%
NCAA D2/D3
0%
Club / ACHA
42%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#5511
Forward overall
#228
Forward born in 1999
#121
in USPHL-Premier

D1 Comparables

Gage Hough
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.39 PPG
→ UMass Lowell (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.22 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Stanislav Dzakhov
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.27 PPG
→ Niagara (0.44 D1 FR PPG)
0.15 Average
NCAAe PPG
Tayler Munson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.31 PPG
→ Alaska Fairbanks (0.35 D1 FR PPG)
0.17 Average
NCAAe PPG
Alexander Dahl
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.21 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Evan Janssen
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.45 PPG
→ Denver (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Connor Fedorek
Utica · 2018-19
0.862 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Nick Vidoni
Westfield State · 2009-10
0.375 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Brad Hofelich
Wisconsin-River Falls · 2016-17
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.