IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Nick Vidoni Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1990-03-30 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2006-07 Nepean Raiders CCHL 2 0 0 0 0.000 — — — —
2007-08 — CCHL 57 15 8 23 0.404 0.0875 0.0927 0.3122 0.3308
2008-09 Rockland Nationals CCHL 56 22 26 48 0.857 0.1859 0.1861 0.6631 0.6637
2009-10 Rockland Nationals CCHL 58 31 47 78 1.345 0.2917 0.2785 1.0405 0.9935
2010-11 — CCHL 25 15 23 38 1.520 0.3297 0.2985 1.1760 1.0647
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2012-13 Westfield State D3 MASCAC — 26 6 12 18 0.692
2011-12 Westfield State D3 MASCAC — 16 2 4 6 0.375
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.25
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.38
2011-12 · Westfield State
+50.8% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#8374
Forward overall
#354
Forward born in 1990
#55
in CCHL

D1 Comparables

Jordan Nelson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.59 PPG
→ Minnesota State (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.31 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Yasin Cissé
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Boston University
0.23 No data
NCAAe PPG
David Goodwin
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.67 PPG
→ Penn State (0.53 D1 FR PPG)
0.35 Average
NCAAe PPG
Carlos Amestoy
OHL · 2012-13 · 0.75 PPG
→ Maine
0.39 No data
NCAAe PPG
Davey Middleton
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Brown (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Brett Everson
Utica · 2016-17
0.895 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Matthew Dozois
Wentworth · 2009-10
0.667 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Roman Ammirato
Utica · 2013-14
1.296 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.