IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Ryan Comishock Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2004-05-13 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2022-23 Lone Star Brahmas NAHL 57 16 17 33 0.579 0.2127 0.2224 0.6110 0.6387
2023-24 Surrey Eagles BCHL 20 3 5 8 0.400 0.1541 0.1507 0.5821 0.5694
2024-25 Lone Star Brahmas NAHL 43 12 16 28 0.651 0.2393 0.2262 0.6873 0.6496
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Augsburg D3 MIAC SO 23 6 7 13 0.565
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.17
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.57
2025-26 · Augsburg
+236.8% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

25%
NCAA D1
15%
NCAA D2/D3
42%
Age-Out / Club
18%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#25534
Forward overall
#1445
Forward born in 2004
#2064
in NAHL

D1 Comparables

Davey Middleton
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Brown (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Eli Lichtenwald
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Jordan Nelson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.59 PPG
→ Minnesota State (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.31 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Justin Parizek
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.93 PPG
→ Nebraska Omaha (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.32 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Yasin Cissé
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Boston University
0.23 No data
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Andrew Francone
Lake Forest · 2000-01
0.583 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Henri Spoof
SUNY Geneseo · 2023-24
0.667 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
James Tatro
Salem State · 2023-24
1.269 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.