← New Search ↗ Social Card

Kyle Contessa Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2002-06-05 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2018-19 New Jersey Rockets NCDC 2 0 0 0 0.000
2019-20 New Jersey Rockets NCDC 33 4 5 9 0.273 0.1112 0.1112 0.2192 0.2192
2020-21 Philadelphia Hockey Club NCDC 3 1 0 1 0.333 0.1359 0.1359 0.2679 0.2679
2021-22 New Jersey Rockets NCDC 39 6 6 12 0.308 0.1254 0.1247 0.2473 0.2458
2022-23 Aberdeen Wings NAHL 55 12 18 30 0.545 0.2004 0.1901 0.5758 0.5461
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Chatham D3 UCHC GR 23 7 8 15 0.652
2024-25 Chatham D3 UCHC SR 22 5 7 12 0.545
2023-24 Chatham D3 UCHC JR 6 3 5 8 1.333
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.14
before college
Actual FR PPG
1.33
2023-24 · Chatham
+850.3% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

38%
NCAA D1
10%
NCAA D2/D3
42%
Age-Out / Club
10%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#28780
Forward overall
#1667
Forward born in 2002

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Strong
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Brown (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.93 PPG
→ Nebraska Omaha (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.32 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.59 PPG
→ Minnesota State (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.31 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Curry · 2024-25
0.833 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Neumann · 2015-16
0.905 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Wisconsin-Superior · 2017-18
0.480 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.