← New Search ↗ Social Card

Braden Fischer Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2002-10-02 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2019-20 Winnipeg Blues MJHL 58 19 26 45 0.776 0.1494 0.1494 0.4890 0.4890
2020-21 Salmon Arm Silverbacks BCHL 16 1 1 2 0.125 0.0482 0.0482 0.1821 0.1821
2021-22 Virden Oil Capitals MJHL 52 35 39 74 1.423 0.2739 0.2733 0.8968 0.8947
2022-23 Minot Minotauros NAHL 24 6 13 19 0.792 0.2812 0.2713 0.8312 0.8019
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Minnesota Duluth D1 NCHC JR 9 1 0 1 0.111
2024-25 Minnesota D1 BigTen 19 2 3 5 0.263
2024-25 Minnesota Duluth D1 NCHC 20 2 3 5 0.250
2023-24 Minnesota Duluth D1 NCHC 22 1 4 5 0.227
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.23
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.23
2023-24 · Minnesota Duluth
-2.4% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

38%
NCAA D1
20%
NCAA D2/D3
38%
Age-Out / Club
2%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#18041
Forward overall
#963
Forward born in 2002

D1 Comparables

NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.00 PPG
→ Denver (0.31 D1 FR PPG)
0.34 Developing
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.03 PPG
→ Nebraska Omaha (0.06 D1 FR PPG)
0.35 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.14 PPG
→ UConn (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.39 Developing
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.79 PPG
→ Bentley (0.19 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Utica · 2018-19
0.679 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
SUNY Plattsburgh · 2018-19
0.720 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
St. Scholastica · 2011-12
0.760 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.