IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Luke Morris Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2003-04-10 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2019-20 Buffalo Thunder USPHL-Premier 3 1 0 1 0.333 0.0376 0.0376 0.1134 0.1134
2021-22 Dauphin Kings MJHL 53 23 17 40 0.755 0.1453 0.1487 0.4756 0.4869
2022-23 — NAHL 55 6 10 16 0.291 0.1033 0.1023 0.3054 0.3026
2023-24 Amarillo Wranglers NAHL 56 10 8 18 0.321 0.1142 0.1077 0.3374 0.3182
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Fredonia D3 SUNYAC SO 26 9 3 12 0.462
2024-25 Fredonia D3 SUNYAC FR 16 4 3 7 0.438
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.09
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.44
2024-25 · Fredonia
+384.5% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

18%
NCAA D1
15%
NCAA D2/D3
62%
Age-Out / Club
5%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#38194
Forward overall
#2378
Forward born in 2003

D1 Comparables

Ali Thomas
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Yasin Cissé
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Boston University
0.23 No data
NCAAe PPG
Eli Lichtenwald
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Will Suter
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.47 PPG
→ Bentley (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Woody Hudson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Joe Harren
St. John's · 2008-09
0.421 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Andy Singerhouse
St. Thomas · 2010-11
0.444 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Chris Raguseo
SUNY Oswego · 2012-13
0.450 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.