← New Search ↗ Social Card

Cooper Rice Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2002-03-04 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2018-19 Proctor Academy NE-Prep 32 10 9 19 0.594 0.1145 0.1145 0.2717 0.2717
2019-20 Proctor Academy NE-Prep 28 9 14 23 0.821 0.1584 0.1584 0.3759 0.3759
2021-22 Steinbach Pistons MJHL 50 16 28 44 0.880 0.1694 0.1641 0.5546 0.5372
2022-23 NAHL 60 5 11 16 0.267 0.0947 0.0886 0.2800 0.2620
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Skidmore D3 SUNYAC GR 27 11 6 17 0.630
2024-25 Skidmore D3 SUNYAC SR 26 9 9 18 0.692
2023-24 Skidmore D3 SUNYAC JR 19 8 2 10 0.526
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.10
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.53
2023-24 · Skidmore
+417.5% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

15%
NCAA D1
10%
NCAA D2/D3
72%
Age-Out / Club
2%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#31857
Forward overall
#1885
Forward born in 2002

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing
NCAAe PPG
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Boston University
0.23 No data
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Strong
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ Wisconsin
0.21 No data
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Wisconsin-Eau Claire · 2008-09
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
Wisconsin-Stout · 2017-18
0.667 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Williams · 2017-18
0.560 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.