IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

David Overbeeke Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2003-02-25 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2019-20 Canterbury NE-Prep 27 2 5 7 0.259 0.0500 0.0500 0.1187 0.1187
2022-23 — NAHL 43 5 3 8 0.186 0.0661 0.0651 0.1953 0.1923
2023-24 Yorkton Terriers SJHL 28 1 4 5 0.179 0.0458 0.0426 0.1324 0.1230
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Norwich D3 LittleEast — 14 0 2 2 0.143
2024-25 Norwich D3 LittleEast — 9 1 1 2 0.222
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.04
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.22
2024-25 · Norwich
+402.7% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

12%
NCAA D1
10%
NCAA D2/D3
75%
Age-Out / Club
2%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#54101
Forward overall
#3722
Forward born in 2003

D1 Comparables

Ali Thomas
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Eli Lichtenwald
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Tayler Munson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.31 PPG
→ Alaska Fairbanks (0.35 D1 FR PPG)
0.17 Average
NCAAe PPG
Stanislav Dzakhov
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.27 PPG
→ Niagara (0.44 D1 FR PPG)
0.15 Average
NCAAe PPG
Ben Ostlie
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.23 PPG
→ Notre Dame
0.13 No data
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Sean Ryan
Salve Regina · 2008-09
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
Jake Mayette
Canton · 2016-17
0.143 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Zachary Sullivan
St. Michael's College · 2016-17
0.200 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.