IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Jake Mayette Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1996-02-23 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2014-15 Cornwall Colts CCHL 8 0 0 0 0.000 — — — —
2015-16 Utica Jr. Comets USPHL-Premier-Classic 7 1 1 2 0.286 0.0802 0.0798 0.2353 0.2341
2016-17 Utica Jr. Comets USPHL-Premier-Classic 39 13 21 34 0.872 0.2447 0.2316 0.7180 0.6795
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2021-22 Canton D3 — SR 22 8 16 24 1.091
2019-20 Canton D1 — JR 20 5 9 14 0.700
2019-20 Canton D3 — JR 20 5 9 14 0.700
2018-19 Canton D1 — SO 19 8 8 16 0.842
2018-19 Canton D3 — SO 19 8 8 16 0.842
2017-18 Canton D3 — FR 21 1 2 3 0.143
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.15
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.14
2017-18 · Canton
-2.3% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#25684
Forward overall
#1042
Forward born in 1996

D1 Comparables

Yasin Cissé
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Boston University
0.23 No data
NCAAe PPG
Will Suter
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.47 PPG
→ Bentley (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Ali Thomas
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing
NCAAe PPG
David Goodwin
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.67 PPG
→ Penn State (0.53 D1 FR PPG)
0.35 Average
NCAAe PPG
Jordan Nelson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.59 PPG
→ Minnesota State (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.31 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Logan Kelly
Canton · 2023-24
0.933 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Alain Joanette
St. Norbert · 2007-08
0.682 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Logan Calder
Salve Regina · 2021-22
0.654 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.