IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Aaron Jeffery Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1985-02-18 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2005-06 Billings Bulls NAHL 54 14 9 23 0.426 0.1565 0.1432 0.4495 0.4112
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2009-10 Utica D3 UCHC SR 18 3 4 7 0.389
2008-09 Utica D3 UCHC JR 26 8 12 20 0.769
2007-08 Utica D3 UCHC SO 25 6 14 20 0.800
2006-07 Utica D3 UCHC FR 17 1 4 5 0.294
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.12
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.29
2006-07 · Utica
+139.9% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#33102
Forward overall
#1032
Forward born in 1985
#3184
in NAHL

D1 Comparables

Ali Thomas
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Yasin Cissé
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Boston University
0.23 No data
NCAAe PPG
Will Suter
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.47 PPG
→ Bentley (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Davey Middleton
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Brown (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Eli Lichtenwald
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Strong
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Matt Saler
St. Scholastica · 2004-05
0.518 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Adam Kudynski
Lebanon Valley · 2004-05
0.909 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Thomas Williams
Hamilton · 2009-10
0.600 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.