IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Carter Theissen Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2003-07-10 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2019-20 Breck USHS-MN 26 6 10 16 0.615 0.0779 0.0779 0.1495 0.1495
2020-21 Breck USHS-MN 21 8 13 21 1.000 0.1266 0.1266 0.2429 0.2429
2021-22 Breck USHS-MN 26 9 15 24 0.923 0.1169 0.1169 0.2242 0.2242
2022-23 Houston Bulls NAHL 53 0 8 8 0.151 0.0554 0.0556 0.1593 0.1598
2023-24 — NAHL 56 5 19 24 0.429 0.1575 0.1505 0.4524 0.4322
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Augustana D1 CCHA SO 24 1 4 5 0.208
2024-25 Augustana D1 CCHA — 6 0 0 0 0.000

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

32%
NCAA D1
18%
NCAA D2/D3
42%
Age-Out / Club
8%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#10372
Defenseman overall
#2226
Defenseman born in 2003

D1 Comparables

Matt Krug
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.21 PPG
→ Union (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.11 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Brandon Carlson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
William Eiserman
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.15 PPG
→ UMass Lowell (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.08 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Dominic Racobaldo
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ American International (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Benjamin Gallacher
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.45 PPG
→ Ohio State (0.50 D1 FR PPG)
0.24 Elite D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Zach Dragun
Worcester State · 2015-16
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
Jordan Neduzak
Wisconsin-Superior · 2012-13
0.429 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Rick Cleaver
Norwich · 2003-04
1.235 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.