← New Search ↗ Social Card

Tyler Hennen Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2004-08-31 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2019-20 Kittson County Central USHS-MN 25 22 37 59 2.360 0.2988 0.2988 0.5732 0.5732
2020-21 Kittson County Central USHS-MN 17 31 23 54 3.176 0.4021 0.4021 0.7716 0.7716
2021-22 Kittson County Central USHS-MN 25 38 35 73 2.920 0.3697 0.3697 0.7093 0.7093
2022-23 Anchorage Wolverines NAHL 7 3 1 4 0.571 0.2099 0.2226 0.6031 0.6395
2023-24 Anchorage Wolverines NAHL 58 15 18 33 0.569 0.2091 0.2117 0.6006 0.6082
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Augustana D1 CCHA SO 27 1 4 5 0.185
2024-25 Augustana D1 CCHA 28 6 7 13 0.464
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.18
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.46
2024-25 · Augustana
+151.1% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

25%
NCAA D1
5%
NCAA D2/D3
30%
Age-Out / Club
40%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#3013
Forward overall
#50
Forward born in 2004

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ RPI (0.24 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Developing
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.80 PPG
→ Army (0.67 D1 FR PPG)
0.29 Strong
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.39 PPG
→ Quinnipiac (0.79 D1 FR PPG)
0.22 Strong
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.20 PPG
→ Army (0.53 D1 FR PPG)
0.11 Average
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.88 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.61 D1 FR PPG)
0.32 Strong
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Norwich · 2018-19
0.500 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Buffalo State · 2022-23
0.720 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Endicott · 2015-16
0.714 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.