IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Andrew Cumming Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2004-12-08 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2020-21 St. Cloud USHS-MN 15 11 6 17 1.133 0.1435 0.1435 0.2753 0.2753
2021-22 St. Cloud USHS-MN 25 18 20 38 1.520 0.1924 0.1924 0.3692 0.3692
2022-23 St. Cloud Norsemen NAHL 11 1 2 3 0.273 0.1002 0.1076 0.2878 0.3091
2023-24 St. Cloud Norsemen NAHL 51 11 14 25 0.490 0.1801 0.1848 0.5174 0.5310
2024-25 St. Cloud Norsemen NAHL 54 4 7 11 0.204 0.0748 0.0728 0.2150 0.2094
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 St. Scholastica D3 MIAC FR 18 2 4 6 0.333
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.10
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.33
2025-26 · St. Scholastica
+231.0% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

22%
NCAA D1
35%
NCAA D2/D3
38%
Age-Out / Club
5%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#41697
Forward overall
#2724
Forward born in 2004

D1 Comparables

Cullen Hurley
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ Wisconsin
0.21 No data
NCAAe PPG
Tayler Munson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.31 PPG
→ Alaska Fairbanks (0.35 D1 FR PPG)
0.17 Average
NCAAe PPG
Stanislav Dzakhov
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.27 PPG
→ Niagara (0.44 D1 FR PPG)
0.15 Average
NCAAe PPG
Alexander Dahl
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.21 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Ben Ostlie
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.23 PPG
→ Notre Dame
0.13 No data
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Chase DiBari
Bethel · 2017-18
0.200 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Lucas Hefty
Concordia · 2018-19
0.200 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Scott Cremen
Canton · 2022-23
0.500 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.