IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Scott Cremen Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2002-12-27 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2020-21 Boston Dukes EHL 2 0 0 0 0.000 — — — —
2021-22 New Jersey Jr. Titans NAHL 37 0 8 8 0.216 0.0803 0.0824 0.2289 0.2348
2022-23 New Jersey Jr. Titans NAHL 9 0 2 2 0.222 0.0825 0.0806 0.2353 0.2298
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Canton D3 SUNYAC SR 26 2 16 18 0.692
2024-25 Canton D3 SUNYAC JR 24 4 14 18 0.750
2023-24 Canton D3 — SO 23 2 8 10 0.435
2022-23 Canton D3 — FR 12 1 5 6 0.500
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.08
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.50
2022-23 · Canton
+542.7% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

8%
NCAA D1
32%
NCAA D2/D3
55%
Age-Out / Club
5%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#14339
Defenseman overall
#2013
Defenseman born in 2002

D1 Comparables

Kyle McKenzie
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.14 PPG
→ Providence (0.15 D1 FR PPG)
0.08 Average D
NCAAe PPG
Garret Peterson
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.35 PPG
→ Army (0.07 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Taki Pantziris
OHL · 2012-13 · 0.29 PPG
→ Brown
0.16 No data
NCAAe PPG
Patrick Koudys
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.23 PPG
→ RPI (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.14 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Joseph Fiala
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.22 PPG
→ Quinnipiac (0.05 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Brett Stirling
Connecticut College · 2016-17
0.364 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Dan Sherer
Milwaukee School of Engineering · 2011-12
1.000 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Jared Martin
Manhattanville · 2014-15
0.381 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.